DPP vs SCIP — What's the Difference?
Both deal with substances of concern; they are not the same filing. SCIP is ECHA's database under EU waste law: since 5 January 2021, EU suppliers of articles containing a Candidate List SVHC above 0.1% weight-by-weight must notify it, so recyclers and consumers can see what's inside. The Digital Product Passport is the ESPR's product record — which will also carry substances data. Same underlying declaration, two destinations; the DPP does not replace the SCIP duty.
Written by Nazrul Islam, Founder, DPPLive · Last updated: 16 July 2026
For garment factories the operational answer is a living substance inventory: full-material declarations from dye houses and trim suppliers, mapped against the twice-yearly Candidate List updates, stored per style and per component. That single dataset answers your buyer's REACH Article 33 questions, powers their SCIP notification, and drops straight into the passport's substances field when the textile act lands. Our data checklist shows where it sits among the other fields.
Quick Answers
Go Deeper
- ECHA — SCIP database (Waste Framework Directive; notifications since 5 January 2021)
- ECHA — REACH Candidate List (SVHC) — Article 33 communication duty
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR) — full text on EUR-Lex — Article 7(5) (substances of concern in the DPP framework)
One Substance Inventory. Every Filing.
Chemical compliance rots when it lives in email threads. Keep one verified substance inventory per style — declarations in, Candidate List mapped, concentrations recorded — and REACH answers, SCIP entries and passport fields all become exports of the same truth. That inventory is native to how DPPLive stores product data.