Who Is Responsible for the DPP — Factory, Brand or Importer?
Legal responsibility for the Digital Product Passport sits with the economic operator placing the product on the EU market — for imported garments normally the EU importer or brand (or an EU authorised representative), not the overseas factory. ESPR (EU) 2024/1781 assigns duties role by role in Articles 27–35, and Article 34 makes an importer or distributor the “manufacturer” once it sells under its own brand or modifies the product. The factory’s real obligation arrives by contract: supplying passport-ready data.
Written by Nazrul Islam, Founder, DPPLive · Last updated: 16 July 2026
“Importers or distributors shall be considered manufacturers for the purposes of this Regulation where they: (a) place a product … on the market under their name or trademark; or (b) modify such a product already placed on the market…”
Most private-label garment trade falls exactly here: the EU brand that puts its own label on your production becomes the legal “manufacturer” — with every DPP duty that carries.
Not Legally Liable — Still Holding the Data
The regulation’s duties stop at the EU border; the data does not. Composition, origin, substances, footprint — everything a passport must contain originates at the factory. Three practical consequences follow.
Quick Answers
Go Deeper
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR) — full text on EUR-Lex — Articles 27–35 (economic operators), Article 34 (deemed manufacturer), Article 12 (unique identifiers), Article 15 (customs)
- European Commission — Digital Product Passport — official FAQ (Dec 2025, PDF)
- CIRPASS (EU-funded DPP consortium) — DPP FAQ
Be the Supplier Whose Data Buyers Trust
You may never be the legally responsible operator — and it will not matter. Orders will flow to factories that deliver verified, passport-ready data without being chased. DPPLive puts that capability on the factory side: structured data intake, identifiers, hosted passports and registry-ready records your EU customers can rely on.